Migrate to Webflow Without Losing Your SEO

The most common route we run. Plugin sprawl, page-builder markup, and years of inconsistent URL patterns are the usual inheritance — we untangle them during URL mapping, not after launch. Blogs of any size move into structured CMS collections, and your team stops maintaining plugins, updates, and security patches entirely.

The main question is never content — it's forms, CTAs, and workflows. We rebuild forms natively or reconnect them to HubSpot via API, so scoring and automation keep running. You keep HubSpot as your CRM and automation layer; you stop paying for it as a CMS.

Usually driven by scale: teams outgrow Framer's CMS limits and need deeper collection structures, localization, or integrations. We rebuild components in Webflow's designer and restructure content into collections built for a bigger publishing operation.

Typically the shortest path — smaller sites, simpler structures, but weak URL control that makes redirects critical. We rebuild the design cleanly, keep every URL accounted for, and hand your marketers a CMS that doesn't fight back.

Not if the migration is done right. Rankings are tied to URLs, content, and metadata — not to the CMS underneath. We keep URLs identical where possible, 301-redirect the rest, transfer metadata and schema one-to-one, and monitor daily for 30 days so any anomaly is caught within hours, not quarters.

It scales with content volume. A marketing site of up to ~20 pages typically takes 2–4 weeks; sites with large blogs (100+ CMS items) or complex CMS structures take 4–6 weeks. You'll get a fixed timeline after the scoping call — migrations are predictable once the URL count is known.

Posts move into structured CMS collections — titles, bodies, images, categories, authors, and metadata included. URLs stay identical wherever the structure allows; where it doesn't, each old URL gets a 301 redirect to its exact new counterpart. No orphaned posts, no chains of redirects, no 404s at launch.

Yes — landing pages, blog, and CMS content all move. Forms are rebuilt natively or reconnected to HubSpot via API, so your workflows, scoring, and CRM data keep working. You keep HubSpot as your marketing automation layer if you want it; you just stop paying for it as a CMS.

It depends on three factors: page and post volume, CMS complexity (collections, references, localization), and how many integrations need rebuilding. A content-heavy site costs more to move than a large-but-simple one. After a scoping call you get a fixed quote — no hourly meters, no surprise change orders.

No. A 1:1 migration — same design, new platform — is often the safer play: one variable changes, so if metrics move, you know why. Redesign is a separate decision with its own process. Plenty of clients migrate first, stabilize rankings, then redesign a quarter later on solid ground.